You know that spark when a chart tells you more than words ever could? I’ve gathered ten standout visualizations, each one remarkable not only for its design but for the real impact it made. Some may not be the most visually stunning but helped make data viz a household term, others are beautiful and actually drove change. In the sections ahead, you’ll learn why each visualization earned its place on this list and what we learned from each.
Florence Nightingale’s rose diagram (or “coxcomb chart”) was groundbreaking in the 1850s. She plotted monthly deaths as wedges whose area, not just length, corresponds to mortality. She turned dry hospital records into a striking visual. And the result wasn’t just beautiful. It revealed that most soldiers died of preventable diseases, not battle wounds. This stimulated vital sanitary reforms.
Innovative use of area: Nightingale didn’t rely on bars or lines. Instead, she mapped each month’s death toll to the area of a wedge. This lets viewers instantly compare magnitudes. Large wedges jump off the page, making spikes in mortality crystal clear.
Engaging aesthetics: The petals of this “rose” chart aren’t decorative fluff. Their graceful shape and distinct color bands guide your eye through the data. By marrying form with function, Nightingale made statistics feel human. This draws in audiences who might otherwise ignore medical reports.
Perfect for seasonality: Months loop naturally in a circle, and this design mirrors our sense of time’s cycle. You sense winter peaks and summer lulls without reading labels. Seasonal patterns are immediately apparent. This emphasizes the importance of disease prevention during the harsh months.
Nightingale’s rose diagram persuaded policymakers to reform hospital sanitation. This proves the power of purpose-driven design. Your chart can do the same: first, define the action you want your audience to take. Next, highlight that insight with size, color contrast, or layout. Finally, add a clear label or note explaining its significance and the steps viewers should follow.
Flow Map of Napoleon’s Invasion of Russia by Charles Joseph Minard (1869)
Flow Map of Napoleon’s 1812 Russian Campaign by Charles Minard (1869). Public Domain.
Source: Wikimedia Commons.
When I asked my colleague Ivan what his favorite data visualization is, he immediately pointed to this map. He said: "For me, Charles Minard’s March Map stands out as a top choice. It’s an incredibly well-thought-out and meticulously crafted visualization. This piece blends various chart forms in a graceful manner. You can grasp its essence immediately, yet it offers intricate details for extended exploration."
Charles Minard’s 1869 flow map visualizes Napoleon’s 1812 Russian campaign in a single image. The thick tan line shows the Grande Armée’s advance toward Moscow, with line width proportional to troop numbers (1 mm = 10 000 soldiers). As the army retreats, a black line traces its path home, again scaled by remaining troops. Along the bottom, a temperature plot (in degrees Réaumur) aligns with dates and locations on the retreat. By layering geography, time, direction, army size, and temperature, Minard’s chart tells a tragic story of war losses that no text alone could convey.
As Edward Tufte wrote in The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (2001), Minard’s map is “possibly the best statistical graphic ever drawn.” Minard’s map shows how deeply data and narrative can work together. When you visualize complex information, weave a clear story through color, size, and sequence so viewers feel the impact and not just see the numbers.
You might not think of the periodic table as a “chart,” but I think it’s one of the most powerful data visualizations ever created. By arranging every known chemical element in a grid based on atomic number and shared properties, it turns a mountain of raw information into a clear map of element behavior. Each cell shows an element’s symbol, atomic number, and atomic weight. Grouping elements with similar chemistry in columns (groups) and fitting trends across rows (periods) reveals patterns that help predict how elements will react.
When handling complex data, look for natural groupings. By organizing related items into clear categories and ordering them logically, you help viewers spot patterns instantly. Whether you’re building a table, chart, or diagram, let the inherent structure of your data guide the layout so that key insights emerge without extra explanation.
Occupations of Negroes and Whites in Georgia, ca. 1900, by W. E. B. Du Bois. Public domain.
Source: Library of Congress
W. E. B. Du Bois and his students created over fifty infographics for the 1900 Paris Exposition. They broke new ground in both design and social advocacy. One standout example is the “Occupations of Negroes and Whites in Georgia” chart. Du Bois used two mirrored fan-shaped pie charts, one for Black Georgians and one for White Georgians. They compare the percentage working in agriculture, domestic service, professional roles, and other categories. Placing these fans side by side makes disparities and overlaps immediately visible.
Du Bois’s work shows that data visualization can be a force for good. By presenting clear, uncluttered charts that reveal inequalities, you make it impossible to ignore social problems. When you base your visuals on solid data and highlight disparities without clutter, viewers are more likely to understand the issues and feel compelled to act.
Interactive bubble chart by Gapminder Foundation. Free material from www.gapminder.org.
Jumping ahead over a century from Du Bois’s 1900 fan charts, Hans Rosling’s 2006 animated scatter plot marked a major leap in time and in how we tell stories with data. In his TED Talk “The Best Stats You’ve Ever Seen,” Rosling brought data to life with a moving bubble chart. Income per person appears on the horizontal axis, life expectancy on the vertical axis, bubble size shows population, and color marks world region. As the chart plays through time—from 1900 up through 2006—you can see countries rise, stall, and catch up in just a few minutes.
Above is the same interactive chart Rosling used. Feel free to play with the time slider and watch history unfold.
Use animation only when it serves your story. First, decide what narrative you want to show, then animate the elements that help tell that story. Keep your transitions smooth and let viewers control playback so they can explore at their own pace. That way animation becomes a tool for clarity instead of just decoration.
Spurious Correlations by Tyler Vigen (2013)
“Votes for Democratic Senators in Delaware” vs. “Worldwide count of earthquakes with a magnitude between 8.0 and 9.9” from Spurious Correlations by Tyler Vigen (CC BY 4.0).
Before I started working in data visualization, I vividly remember encountering a set of charts that were both hilarious and thought-provoking. Tyler Vigen’s Spurious Correlations project, launched in 2013, pairs unrelated time series to show that just because two lines move together doesn’t mean one causes the other. These charts grabbed my attention and taught me early on how easily data can deceive.
Tyler Vigen launched the Spurious Correlations project in 2013. He collected hundreds of simple plots where two unrelated time series happen to correlate almost perfectly. For example, the number of Nicolas Cage films released each year versus the number of people who drowned by falling into a pool. These examples demonstrate that a high correlation coefficient doesn’t imply any causal relationship. Sometimes unrelated trends simply move together by coincidence.
Be vigilant with data and visuals. Always question if the numbers truly belong together. Check for hidden factors, and clearly explain any limitations so your audience isn’t misled by coincidence.
Poppy Field by Valentina D’Efilippo (2013 book; interactive version 2014)
Poppy Field by Valentina D’Efilippo. Public domain source data by The Polynational War Memorial; design and code © Valentina D’Efilippo & Nicolas Pigelet. Available at poppyfield.org.
Valentina D’Efilippo first published this chart as a static infographic in her 2013 book The Infographic History of the World. In November 2014, she and developer Nicolas Pigelet released an interactive version at poppyfield.org. The visualization represents major 20th-century conflicts as a field of poppies. Each poppy’s stem stretches from the year a war began to when it ended. The size of its petals corresponds to the number of deaths, and its color indicates the region where the fighting took place. Scrolling or hovering over a poppy reveals exact years and fatality figures. This turns raw war statistics into a living, unfolding tapestry of modern history.
Use symbols or metaphors to create an emotional link between data and theme. A well-chosen icon binds people to the topic, makes the story memorable, and helps viewers grasp complex information quickly.
Warming Stripes by Ed Hawkins (Show Your Stripes). Available at https://showyourstripes.info/s/globe. Licensed under CC BY 4.0. No changes were made.
Climate warming is one of today’s most urgent issues, and no graphic captures it more powerfully than the “warming stripes. Each stripe represents one year’s average temperature: blue for cooler years, red for warmer ones. Laid side by side, they form a simple yet startling portrait of our changing climate.
On showyourstripes.info, anyone can generate their own regional stripes. You can turn global data into a personal story.
Embrace minimalism: remove all non-essential details so that your visual elements alone convey the core message instantly and powerfully.
As we saw with spurious correlations, even familiar charts can mislead if you don’t question what they really show. That caution holds true for U.S. electoral maps, too.
In September 2019, Lara Trump tweeted the classic 2016 choropleth. Every state painted solid red or blue by its winning candidate with the caption “Try to impeach this.” The map looked overwhelmingly red, but it hid the fact that most votes came from dense population centers.
In response, Karim Douïeb launched “Try to Impeach This” (https://try-to-impeach-this.jetpack.ai/). It is an interactive version that redraws each county as a dot sized by its actual voter population and colored by the winner. Scroll or hover, and you see instantly how “acres don’t vote—people do,” exposing the true electoral picture that Lara Trump’s original map obscured.
Always question whether your chart type and data truly reflect reality. Before you publish, ask: “Does this visualization show the whole story or could it mislead?” If you’re mapping results, consider using population-weighted designs or clear annotations so your audience sees the truth, not just a pretty graphic.
Screenshot of the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Dashboard. Image via Pexels (free stock photo, no attribution required).
During the COVID-19 pandemic, data visualization, particularly dashboards, experienced a surge in popularity. People sought to understand the rapidly evolving situation. A standout example that became popular, is the COVID-19 Dashboard by Johns Hopkins University. This dashboard rose to prominence due to its comprehensive approach. It draws data from a lot of sources to provide a global overview of the pandemic. Its widespread use meant that even individuals outside the data field became familiar with it. A quick online search for "dashboard" often surfaces images of this iconic interface.
Unfortunately, the dashboard is no longer active; data collection ceased on October 3, 2023.
Always design with your audience in mind. The Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Dashboard was built for the general public. It uses straightforward maps and simple time-series charts that anyone, from beginners to experts, can interpret at a glance.
If you’re creating a tool for specialist users, you can lean on more advanced or niche chart types. Your audience will appreciate and understand the extra complexity. Your audience’s understanding is the true measure of a good design.
Each visualization here did more than just display numbers. Some fueled reform or challenged injustice, while others reshaped how we think about data. For example, Nightingale’s rose diagram drove health reforms, Du Bois’s fan charts highlighted racial inequities, Minard’s flow map revealed the human cost of war, and modern tools like the electoral cartogram corrected misleading narratives. Meanwhile, the spurious correlations charts taught us to question causation, Rosling’s animated bubbles turned static stats into a living story, and the periodic table made complex chemistry intuitive.
What they share is the power to turn raw data into a clear story that resonates beyond a spreadsheet. Data visualization isn’t only about creating something that looks good; it’s about revealing insights, starting conversations, and inspiring real change.
You might be a seasoned data professional or just someone who loves a good chart. I hope these examples encourage you to think carefully about how you present information. Use your visuals to inform, connect, and make a difference.
If you’d like to spend less time on repetitive chart‐building and more time on the insights themselves, consider automating your workflow with the Datylon Report Server. By using Datylon’s API to generate and update charts and reports automatically, you can ensure that your visuals stay up to date without manual effort, so you can focus on what really matters.
Curious about automated reporting? Explore our dedicated blog article or schedule a personalized demo with one of our experts.